Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:19

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
McDonald’s to suffer massive boycott from customers - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Do you like to wear a see-through skirt?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How to Build Conscious Machines - Hacker News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Can you wash a dog with washing liquid used for humans?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What to know about nerve pain and tingling hands and feet - The Washington Post
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Power Rankings: Rocket Classic - PGA Tour
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.